Benutzer Diskussion:Finnrind
Letzter Kommentar: vor 13 Jahren von Finnrind in Abschnitt Sichtungsrecht
Willkommensgruß
[Quelltext bearbeiten]Hallo Finnrind – Willkommen in der Wikipedia!
Für den Anfang ein paar Tipps, damit du dich in Wikipedia möglichst schnell zurecht findest:
Herzliche Grüße und viel Spaß! --Schweinepeterle 21:39, 1. Sep. 2007 (CEST) |
- Thanks, I established this user account mainly to fix links etc from commons (and possibly add some iw from Norwegian wikipedia. I understand some German, but I don't write well enough to even try contributing here with more than the occasional link. Finnrind 21:51, 1. Sep. 2007 (CEST)
Sichtungsrecht
[Quelltext bearbeiten]Hi, ich habe dir Sichtungsrecht erteilt – melde dich, solltest du nicht einverstanden sein. Gruß --dealerofsalvation 07:36, 7. Sep. 2011 (CEST)
- Apologies for replying in English - I can read&understand German but I can't write very well. A couple of years ago I asked for this status to be removed, as I felt more comfortable with my edits being checked by local trusted editors. But I am fine with "sichtungsrecht" if you (dewiki-community) are, I'll leave this for you to decide. Most of my edits here should be uncontroversial&at times there are quite a lot of them, so I understand if you don't want to have to check them. Best regards, Finn Rindahl 13:08, 7. Sep. 2011 (CEST)
- Well, this should be perfect. We know you are not committing bad edits on purpose, that’s the main criterion. For your edits of removing spam links, we cannot expect all our “Sichters” to be familiar with the criteria for spam and to verify if you correctly judged a link as spam – most would just judge that you removed it based on a reasonable process and wave your edit through, so there’s really no point in having to do so. --dealerofsalvation 18:07, 7. Sep. 2011 (CEST)
- OK, thanks (and apologies for the inconvenience). Best regards, Finn Rindahl 23:00, 7. Sep. 2011 (CEST)
- Well, this should be perfect. We know you are not committing bad edits on purpose, that’s the main criterion. For your edits of removing spam links, we cannot expect all our “Sichters” to be familiar with the criteria for spam and to verify if you correctly judged a link as spam – most would just judge that you removed it based on a reasonable process and wave your edit through, so there’s really no point in having to do so. --dealerofsalvation 18:07, 7. Sep. 2011 (CEST)