Diskussion:DDL intercettazioni

The law was proposed in 2008

Please see here for further information. --Pequod76 13:08, 6. Okt. 2011 (CEST)

Verfassungwidrig?

Sollte das Gestz wirklich so sein wie behauptet dann widerspräche es doch völlig ver italienischen Verfassung, den EU-Vertragen, der UN-Menschenrechtscharta und allem was in Europa seit sechzig Jahren politsich normal ist und gehört eher nach Nordkorea oder Turkmenistan. Was sagen denn italienische Verfassungsrechtler dazu, dass muss doch schon mal irgendwo diskutiert worden sein--Antemister 13:51, 6. Okt. 2011 (CEST)

Ausgang unklar

Hier wird Mitte Oktober 2011 der Stand der Dinge so beschrieben:

• a) after our protest, an amendment has been agreed upon by all the political parties represented in a restricted committee of supervisors; this unanimity included a rep. by the Government's party. This amendment would keep it.wiki safe.
• b) whenever this bill should be brought to vote, there are two alternative options:
  • 1) the vote is an ordinary vote and if the bill is enacted, it would be amended as above, per the Committee's amendment. The act should then be sent back to the Senate for an approval in the identical text. Wikipedia safe.
  • 2) the Government asks for the "fiducia" on this proposal. In this case the act's content wouldn't be discussed for what it means and implies, but the proposed rule would be voted as a sort of YES/NO approval of the Government (instead of the act in itself); as such, no amendements have effect on the originally proposed text. If enacted, only the originally proposed text would pass: it.wiki and Italian Wikipedians will be in dramatic trouble.

Seitdem ist die Regierung Berlusconi IV abgetreten (Nov. 2011). Damit ist dieser alte Entwurf vielleicht Geschichte. --Atlasowa 19:24, 13. Dez. 2011 (CET)

jupp, scheint mir auch so. er war ja maßgeschneidert. *hüst* Catfisheye 19:05, 13. Jan. 2012 (CET)