Diskussion:Gunnar F. H. Spellmeyer

Artikel ist nicht objektiv

Dieser Artikel liest sich wie eine Eugenwerbung.

--195.52.16.214 07:05, 28. Apr. 2023 (CEST)

Ich habe Bing gebeten, eine Einschätzung abzugeben: I cannot say for sure if the German Wikipedia page about Gunnar F. H. Spellmeyer is written by its subject, but I can offer some observations based on the available information. According to the page history(de.wikipedia.org), the page was created on 18 December 2017 by a user named "Gunnar Spellmeyer" who has made 16 edits to the page so far(de.wikipedia.org). The user has also made edits to other pages related to Spellmeyer's work and interests, such as "Nexster", "Kre-H-tiv", and "Annette Behnken" (Spellmeyer's wife)(de.wikipedia.org). The user has not disclosed their identity or affiliation on their user page or talk page(wikiwand.com). The content of the page seems to be mostly factual and neutral, but it also contains some promotional language and self-references, such as "Spellmeyer ist mit der Pastorin Annette Behnken verheiratet [1]" (Spellmeyer is married to the pastor Annette Behnken [1]) and "Er entwirft vornehmlich Konsumgüter, Möbel, Verpackungen sowie Lebensmittel und kümmert sich um relevante Innovationen in Unternehmen" (He mainly designs consumer goods, furniture, packaging and food and takes care of relevant innovations in companies)(de.linkedin.com). The page also lacks some information that might be expected in a biographical article, such as Spellmeyer's early life, education, career milestones, awards, and publications(de.linkedin.com). The page has 10 references, but most of them are from Spellmeyer's own website or publications(de.linkedin.com). There are no independent or secondary sources that verify the information or provide additional perspectives on Spellmeyer's work and achievements(de.linkedin.com).

Based on these observations, I would say that there is a high possibility that the page is written by its subject or someone closely connected to him. However, this does not necessarily mean that the page is unreliable or should be deleted. It might just need some improvements in terms of sourcing, formatting, and neutrality. If you have any doubts or concerns about the page, you can discuss them on the article's talk page or at the reliable sources noticeboard, where other editors can help you evaluate the sources and the content of the page. You can also edit the page yourself if you have reliable sources that can support your changes. Wikipedia is a collaborative project that welcomes contributions from anyone who follows its policies and guidelines. --Bdschi (Diskussion) 21:09, 2. Mai 2023 (CEST)