Diskussion:Djavidan Hanum
Defekte Weblinks
[Quelltext bearbeiten]Die folgenden Weblinks wurden von einem Bot („GiftBot“) als nicht erreichbar erkannt. |
---|
|
- http://www.graz03.at/servlet/sls/Tornado/web/2003/content/66F43A4DA8359F8EC1256B0E003A608C
- Vielleicht ist eine archivierte Version geeignet: archive.org
- Netzwerk-Fehler (7) andere Artikel, gleiche Domain
- http://www.egy.com/historica/94-10-06.shtml
- Vielleicht ist eine archivierte Version geeignet: archive.org
- Im Jahr 2012 bereits defekt gewesen.
– GiftBot (Diskussion) 21:12, 16. Jan. 2016 (CET)
Wake up
[Quelltext bearbeiten]Dear Editors and Reviewers!
I am sorry that my posts from October 2023 were deleted. I am not of German nationality, I do not live in a German-speaking area, my German relatives were deported from this country in 1946, while my mother was in the GULAG. I did not learn German well, the spelling mistakes could have been corrected if the reviewers had been benevolent. Now let's look at the content of the article. It was not cited, but 50% of it is the biography of the princess sold to the weekly Münchner Illustrierte in 1951, which was essentially known from Hungarian newspapers between 1913-1937. Let's just say that not a word of it is true. Let's see, "Mays älterer Bruder, Josef Török (* 1873), wurde am Wiener Theresianum, der k. & k. Militärakademie, erzogen; als May ihn 1890, im Alter von erst dreizehn Jahren, allein dort besuchte, traf sie auf einen Kommilitonen ihres Bruders, den türkisch-ägyptischen Prinzen Abbas Hilmi." It's not embarrassing that there is no military academy in Vienna and never has been, because it's in "Wiener Neustadt". It is not embarrassing that Count Joseph Török Jr. did not study at any Theresianum, he is not on the student list. Isn't it embarrassing that they don't even know the princess's name, while her name and origin have already been proven and published by others?
There's no need to list any more. Have fun with the language problems. --84.236.87.105 17:09, 24. Dez. 2024 (CET)
- I forgot to log in earlier. So it's clear to you who is disparaging this masterpiece. --Lajokka (Diskussion) 17:14, 24. Dez. 2024 (CET)